WAN233

歡迎

最新留言：七年前一則留言一個人參與討論

自永樂修典，四庫編成，古今圖冊，收攬完備。惟近世曉覺道理，百家爭鳴。西學東漸，各有始末。士紳茫茫，遠不及逮。疑古者眾，怨舊者多。於是斥逐儒術，貶抑性理。殷周之明，莫非妖言；泰西末流，敬為上賓。崇外若此，至今百年。會西國志士，立典於網絡，開共筆之先河。吾人乃竊取一處，成以文言，謀復古法，載新世之大道，以揚中華文理，興千年舊邦，故亟需善古文而博今道者。願足下能同遊，共為大典，修先世之廢道，著當今之新知。

又，古文維基大典，以其從古，多有異於外文，宜先閱典章、凡例、章法，以求壹道。

如有垂詢賜教，請至會館。燕語如故，亦無不可。

損齋 (對話) 二〇一七年一月二〇日（五）一三時四六分 (UTC)回覆

瓦西里·奇比涅夫

最新留言：二年前二則留言二個人參與討論

閣下以「生不立傳」為由刪瓦西里·奇比涅夫，唯玆人蓋逝於二零二二年三月三日，由是不應刪。若汝有他由刪之，則未嘗不可。--太陽巴（議）二〇二二年五月一七日（二）一一時二一分 (UTC)回覆

答Sun8908：觀其全文，蓋為簡體，誤書事由，還望海涵。--—启明 (留言) 二〇二二年五月一七日（二）一三時二一分 (UTC)回覆

请阁下帮助

最新留言：二年前二則留言二個人參與討論

中文维基文库有个资深用户提出了这个问题。介于阁下专心于古文知识，学识渊博，应有我们都想要的答案，请阁下不吝赐教。

《珠淵選集》與《珠淵集》是否是同一本書？ Assifbus（留言）二〇二二年五月二五日（三）一三時五三分 (UTC)回覆

答Assifbus：首先从书名上来看，选集一般是对某个作品的精选。另外，虽未尝拜读此书，但我个人简单查阅了一下[一] [二]，似乎是同一作品。--—启明 (留言) 二〇二二年五月二六日（四）〇三時五三分 (UTC)回覆

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS

最新留言：一年前一則留言一個人參與討論

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 二〇二三年七月一〇日（一）一二時〇八分 (UTC)回覆